Five ASX Small Caps With AI Data Centre Optionality
- Noel Ong

- 6 hours ago
- 12 min read
The easy way to read the AI data-centre boom is to count the gigawatts being announced. The more useful questions are where those gigawatts will come from, who will pay for them and whether the proposed site can ever be connected.
That distinction matters because the numbers being discussed are no longer ordinary commercial loads.
A single hyperscale data centre campus can draw several hundred megawatts of continuous power, on a par with a mid-sized industrial precinct or a small city, and some of the proposals in this piece are pitched at up to 1GW or 2GW (Figure 1). Networks built for households and existing industry were never sized for that kind of load to arrive in one location almost overnight. That is the pressure behind Australia's shift from simply welcoming data centres to attaching conditions to them.

Figure 1: Aerial view of Microsoft’s new AI data centre campus in Mt Pleasant, Wisconsin (Source: Microsoft)
The conditions now on the table are specific. New large facilities are expected to help underwrite the new electricity supply they need, rather than draw down capacity meant for everyone else. They are expected to fund their own connection costs, rather than push those costs onto other network users. They are expected to curtail their own power use when the grid is under strain, so a heatwave that stresses household supply does not get worse because a data centre keeps running at full draw. And they are expected to show they use water efficiently, because the cooling systems large computing facilities need can be heavy water users in regions where water is already contested.
On top of that, the federal government has directed that new data centres should mostly run on renewable energy. Gas can help firm that supply when the sun is not shining or the wind is not blowing, but is not meant to be the primary source.
Put together, this reshapes who is actually well positioned in the sector. It favours companies that already hold a working combination of developable land, grid access, new generation, storage, gas firming and fibre, over companies that simply hold gas in the ground or have attached an "AI" label to a project that predates any of this - and it looks like resources and energy companies are well-positioned to fill this gap.
This story discusses five ASX small caps that are well-positioned to host data centres
The vocabulary, in plain English A hyperscaler is a very large technology company, such as a cloud computing provider, that builds and runs its own giant data centres. A heads of agreement, or HoA, is an early document that sets out what two parties intend to agree. It can be non-binding, where neither side is legally obliged to proceed, or binding, where the parties have made a legal commitment even before a full contract is signed. A power purchase agreement, or PPA, is a contract to buy electricity from a specific generator over a set period. MW means megawatt and GW means gigawatt, a GW is 1,000 MW, and both measure electricity capacity, not the amount actually used. Freehold land is land the company owns outright, as opposed to a lease or an option to buy. Firming means adding backup generation, such as gas or batteries, so that renewable power stays reliable when the sun is not shining or the wind is not blowing. Voluntary administration is a formal process where an independent administrator takes control of a company that cannot pay its debts, to work out whether it can be restructured, sold, or wound up. |
How do the ASX Data Centre optionality plays compare?
Table 1: Companies with AI data centre optionality
Company | ASX | Market cap | Key asset | AI-opportunity | Stage |
1414 Degrees | 14D | approximately A$43m | Aurora Energy Precinct, SA | Up to 1GW renewable-powered campus | Proposed, feasibility stage, non-binding HoA signed |
Beetaloo Energy Australia | BTL | approximately A$346m | Carpentaria gas plus Weddell site, Northern Territory | 2GW off-grid gas-powered campus concept | Pre-FEED, feasibility stage |
Strike Energy | STX | approximately A$341m | South Erregulla gas plant and precinct, WA | Firmed renewable-powered industrial and data precinct | Under construction, commissioning, data centre case speculative |
Frontier Energy | FHE | approximately A$216m | Waroona solar and battery site, WA | Renewable-powered campus beside 330kV transmission infrastructure | Under construction, early works, data centre case speculative |
Pilot Energy | PGY | approximately A$6.8m | Cliff Head/Arrowsmith and Three Springs, WA | Modular compute plus proposed 50MW solar and battery campus | Operating 0.4MW module, proposed 50MW site, company in voluntary administration |
Prices and market caps above are indicative, mostly from 6 to 7 August 2026, calculated from market price and the latest disclosed or post-raising share count where available, and can differ across delayed data feeds. Approximate prices used were A$0.061 for 14D, A$0.230 for BTL, A$0.095 for STX, A$0.195 for FHE and A$0.054 for PGY. Pilot's market cap uses its last traded price because its securities are currently suspended. Readers should check current prices and suspension status on the ASX before making any decision.
1. 1414 Degrees (ASX: 14D)
14D controls the 15.8-square-kilometre Aurora Energy Precinct near Port Augusta, South Australia, under long-term tenure.
Moreover, the company's silicon-based thermal energy storage technology – SiBrick® – safely and efficiently stores renewable electricity as latent heat (Figure 2).

Figure 2: SiBrick® - company's silicon-based thermal energy storage technology (Source: 14D Website)
The site has highway access, water infrastructure, transcontinental fibre and high-voltage transmission next door. Its approved 140MW/280MWh battery, up to 900MW of solar potential and a proposed data centre campus give it a workable combination of renewable power, storage and land.
Management says an initial 17MW can connect through 33kV infrastructure, around 200MW through 275kV infrastructure, and up to 1GW through staged upgrades. These are development pathways, not power that is already contracted. The grid operator AEMO and network owner ElectraNet have accepted generator performance standards for the battery, but final connection terms, an electricity offtake deal and construction funding are still outstanding.
In July 2026, 14D signed a non-binding HoA with an unnamed Australian operator. It gives that operator exclusivity over an initial 40-hectare parcel and covers up to 1GW in total. The operator is expected to bring capital and operating expertise, but no lease, PPA, named hyperscaler customer or financial terms have been disclosed.
2. Beetaloo Energy Australia (ASX: BTL)
BTL holds exclusive negotiating rights, described as a "not-to-deal" arrangement rather than ownership or a signed lease, over 185 hectares at Weddell, about 30 kilometres from Darwin (Figure 3).The company has proposed a two-campus, up to 2GW AI data centre development there. The flat, cleared site sits near the planned Territory Energy Link and a proposed subsea cable landing point connecting to Asia.

Figure 3: Beetaloo's Major holdings across both McArthur and Beetaloo Basins (Source: BTL Website)
The concept would run on gas generated on site from BTL's Beetaloo gas holdings, built larger than needed so it does not draw power from the Northern Territory grid. Fibre access, water supply and cooling design have not been made public.
The gas backing this concept sits at BTL's Carpentaria project, where the company reports about 1.6 trillion cubic feet of contingent gas resources. Pilot gas production is targeted for late 2026, so the fuel source is not yet in production. The Weddell project remains at concept and pre-FEED stage, meaning early feasibility work before a full front-end engineering design, and still needs a funding consortium, proven gas supply, financing, approvals and signed land and infrastructure agreements. A memorandum of understanding with Halliburton covers technical collaboration only, not project capital or a data centre customer.
3. Strike Energy (ASX: STX)
Strike owns 3,500 hectares of freehold, previously cleared farmland at South Erregulla, roughly 280 kilometres north of Perth and 45 kilometres east of Three Springs, Western Australia (Figure 4).The site combines gas resources, planned renewable generation and an 85MW gas-fired power station. The original development case pointed to transmission lines about 15 kilometres away, gas reserves in the highest confidence category, and around 1.3 petajoules of annual fuel demand supporting more than 25 years of operation.

Figure 4: Strike’s petroleum acreage in the onshore, northern Perth Basin (Source: STK Website)
By 29 June 2026, all 20 generating units at the power station had been commissioned on gas. Grid and network commissioning, along with dedicated connection works, were still continuing at that date, so the power supply is not yet fully proven for a data centre load. The 85MW plant was designed mainly as a peaking and reserve-capacity asset, not dedicated round-the-clock baseload supply, so additional generation or storage would be needed to supply a data centre.
Strike has publicly argued that gas, solar and wind in the Mid West region could support data centres, but this is company positioning rather than a signed deal. No data centre developer, hyperscaler customer, site plan, fibre connection, cooling water source or commercial agreement has been disclosed.
4. Frontier Energy (ASX: FHE)
Frontier owns approximately 820 to 830 hectares at Waroona, around 120 kilometres south of Perth, about 500 metres from Western Power's Landwehr transmission terminal. Stage One of its project is 132MW of solar generation, an 81.5MW/565MWh battery, and a new 330kV substation. A fixed-price construction contract has been awarded, and lenders have given credit approval for debt of up to A$280 million, though that debt still needs final documentation and conditions to be met. Combined with an equity raising in July, management expects Stage One to be fully funded, with first power targeted for the second half of 2028. A further Stage Two, covering about 120MW of solar and an 80MW battery, has approvals in place.

Figure 5: FHE Waroona Infrastructure (Source: FHE June 2026 Presentation)
This makes Frontier one of the better renewable-powered land assets in the screen on paper, with freehold scale, a high-voltage connection point and long-duration storage matching the direction of federal policy. Water capacity, carrier-grade fibre and any formal data centre development application have not been publicly verified. Media reports said AI company Sharon AI had considered an equity position in Frontier, and that Frontier receives approaches from interested parties, but Sharon AI denied it had bought the reported stake. No agreement, customer or data centre plan has been announced by Frontier itself.
5. Pilot Energy (ASX: PGY) - In administration
Pilot commissioned 0.4MW of a planned 1MW modular high-performance-compute facility at Arrowsmith, WA, in April 2026, using existing gas and part of its approximately 4.4MW of generation capacity. The remaining 0.6MW needs an electrical upgrade. Management has pointed to Starlink and a Vocus fibre route about 10 kilometres away, but a carrier-grade fibre connection, a confirmed water source and the actual workload running on the facility have not been verified.
Separately, Pilot signed a binding HoA with a company called SNE, covering land acquisition, solar and battery storage and a proposed 50MW data centre at Three Springs, with milestone payments due to Pilot. Due diligence and the definitive contracts under that HoA were incomplete, and there was no certainty the deal would proceed to completion.
Pilot subsequently appointed voluntary administrators, and its securities are now suspended from trading. That means the 0.4MW facility's current operating status, and whether its counterparties still intend to proceed, both need to be reconfirmed. Pilot's larger Mid West infrastructure, including roads, pipelines and an offshore reservoir at Cliff Head, may still hold value in its own right, but that infrastructure does not by itself make a working data centre campus.
Which of the five stand out
1414 Degrees offers the widest gap between its roughly A$43 million market value and a potentially large campus of up to 1GW. Aurora already combines a large controlled site, transmission access, fibre, water infrastructure, solar potential and an approved battery project. The HoA is real, if early, commercial evidence. A binding lease, a staged connection agreement or a named creditworthy customer could change how the market sees the company. The current discount reflects that exclusivity is non-binding, grid capacity is not reserved at the full 1GW, and construction funding has not been arranged.
Strike Energy's 3,500-hectare freehold precinct, dedicated gas, 85MW of generation and grid works are more tangible physical infrastructure than most companies on this list can show. A renewable partner and a signed data centre tenant could let Strike use its existing investment to move faster than a company starting from nothing. But Strike has no data centre counterparty at all. Its current valuation rests mainly on its energy assets, so upside from AI data centres is possible but unproven.
Frontier Energy is the closest company to displacing Strike in this group. It has a better fit with the renewable-power policy direction, but its data centre interest is based on media reports rather than a signed agreement, and first power is not expected until 2028.
Pilot Energy is the only one of the five that has both a binding, data centre-specific HoA and equipment already running at a customer-facing scale. On paper, that is more commercial progress than any of the other four can show. In practice, the company's move into voluntary administration overwhelms that progress. Whether the SNE agreement, the operating module, or Pilot's broader infrastructure hold any of their earlier value now depends on the outcome of the administration, not on the underlying data centre case.
The risks that apply across this group
Building a data centre-scale campus, plus new generation, storage and fibre, can cost far more than these companies are currently worth on the market. 14D has recently raised equity and would need considerably more capital to fund a full-scale campus. Frontier's credit-approved debt and equity package is the most advanced project funding among the five, but it is still subject to conditions. Beetaloo still needs to assemble consortium-scale capital before Weddell can proceed. Pilot's funding position is now a matter for its administrators rather than ordinary equity or debt raising.
A nearby transmission line does not mean firm capacity is actually available. Connection studies, equipment needed to maintain grid stability, network upgrades, curtailment rules and queue position can all affect what a company can actually deliver. Announced capacity targets should not be treated as capacity that is already connected.
Water rights and cooling design are often not disclosed. Dry cooling reduces water use but can increase construction cost and energy use. Being near a fibre route is not the same as having a confirmed, carrier-grade connection.
Data centre, generation, transmission and water approvals are separate approval processes. Gas developments carry additional emissions, Traditional Owner, environmental and social approval risks. Land options or exclusivity periods can lapse before approvals are granted.
Forecasts for AI computing demand may prove too high. More efficient chips, liquid cooling and changes in where workloads are located could reduce the value of remote sites. Large technology companies can also bypass smaller companies and contract directly with utilities.
Gas price, how much of a contingent gas resource actually converts into a produced reserve, production decline and carbon costs can all reduce the economics of gas-fired, behind-the-meter power. Under Australia's developing policy framework, gas-only campuses face the most exposure, and renewable PPAs and storage are likely to be needed alongside them.
An HoA, whether binding or non-binding, is not revenue on its own, and a signed agreement can still fail to complete, as Pilot's own situation shows. Small management teams have to manage energy, property, telecommunications and digital infrastructure work all at the same time, on top of everyday production and funding pressures. A company appointing administrators can leave every other commercial arrangement it has signed in doubt.
Samso Concluding Comments
1414 Degrees has the most complete package among the five, on the evidence available. Aurora combines controlled land, high-voltage infrastructure, a fibre corridor, water access, solar potential and an approved battery, and its non-binding HoA is a step beyond a purely theoretical proposal. At a market value of roughly A$43 million, successfully de-risking the project could be significant for the company. It remains a high-risk development, with no confirmed customer, lease, large-scale connection or funding secured yet.
Strike Energy has the more tangible, near-operational infrastructure of the remaining companies with an intact balance sheet, but no data centre counterparty at all. Frontier Energy would move ahead of Strike if it announced a credible operator, or a verified data centre fibre and water solution, of its own. Pilot Energy is the clearest illustration in this group of the gap between having signed something and having a viable business. It has the most advanced data centre-specific agreement and the most equipment actually running, and also the single largest company-level risk of the five, now that it is in the hands of administrators.

The Samso Way – Seek the Research
Here at Samso, we pride ourselves on delivering content for investors that is independent and informed by over three decades of experience in the industry. Our content is well-researched and is only created if I see merit in discussing the company's story.
Our mission is simple: cut through the noise and spotlight what matters—genuine stories, grounded insights, and real opportunity.
Our content is well-researched and is only created if the team sees merit in discussing the company or concept. Investors can explore our three core platforms:
There may be numerous paths to success in investing, but the common thread among successful individuals is that they remain committed to making informed decisions. Equip yourself with the right knowledge and tools, and you will be well on your way to achieving your financial goals.
Most importantly, investors need to be absolutely diligent in understanding their own risk-reward tolerance and capabilities. Never bite off more than you can chew. As they say, Rome wasn’t built in a day, and the Great Wall stood because it took centuries to complete.
The Samso Philosophy:
Stay curious. Stay sharp. And remember—digging deeper always uncovers the real value.
In Life, there is no such thing as a Free Lunch.
Never bite off more than you can chew is my parting comment.
Happy Investing, and the only four-letter word you need to know is DYOR.
To support our independent work, please head over to our Support Page and give us a helping hand in any of the ways listed. This is a new initiative for the Samso Platform, and it was always the concept of Samso when we started this journey in 2018.
Disclaimer
The information or opinions provided herein do not constitute investment advice, an offer, or solicitation to subscribe for, purchase, or sell the investment product(s) mentioned herein. It does not take into consideration, nor have any regard to your specific investment objectives, financial situation, risk profile, tax position and particular, or unique needs and constraints.
Samso is a trusted platform that equips dedicated investors with up-to-date industry knowledge and insights from top CEOs and thought leaders. By staying informed on business advancements and market trends, investors can enhance their financial decisions through a combination of expert guidance and their own research.
Samso News | www.samso.com.au | An Investor Lens on ASX-Listed Companies




Comments